Plan an AI Vendor Switch Before You Need One
Switching providers under pressure is risky. ProofMap helps teams test alternatives and keep a credible plan ready.
Get StartedWhy Choose ProofMap
Qualify replacements
Compare alternate providers against your real objectives and tool workflows.
Check compatibility
Test prompts, structured outputs, MCP behavior, latency, and cost on the new runtime.
Decide rollout scope
Move only the workflows that pass and keep fallback coverage for the rest.
Comparison
| Workflow | Without ProofMap | With ProofMap |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate AI behavior | Teams rely on demos, logs, and manual spot checks. | Run objective-bound evaluations against prompts, models, MCP tools, and runtime mappings. |
| Handle change | Prompt, model, context, schema, memory, or vendor changes create hidden regressions. | Compare candidates to baselines and promote only qualified packages. |
| Support developers | Developers trace failures across tools, providers, data, and one-off scripts. | Failures become repeatable tests with clear evidence and recommended fixes. |
| Control production risk | Fallbacks, permissions, and degraded modes are invented when pressure hits. | Approved mappings and fallback paths are ready before launch, incidents, or migration deadlines. |
Frequently Asked Questions
Why have a vendor switching plan?
Prices, reliability, policies, and procurement priorities can change quickly, and teams need options.
Can switching be partial?
Yes. ProofMap supports partial qualification and fallback mappings so teams can switch safely by workflow.
How does this save developer time?
It makes evaluation, debugging, approval, and regression testing repeatable instead of forcing developers to rebuild evidence for every AI change.
What does ProofMap produce?
ProofMap produces objective-bound evaluations, failure evidence, recommendations, and approved prompt or runtime mappings for production use.